- in crowds, innovation is a goal in it's own sense, there are many innovators, providing individually small contributions, an example is Crash the Super Bowl.
- in hives, the intention is to produce a "quality product", innovation as a goal is also an important idiosyncratic, but here, there are few individuals providing individually larger contributions, an example is Skibuilders
- in mobs, you a limited number of experts speak to a interest group, examples are Slave to Target and The Huffington Post
- in swarms, there are numerous contributors with small individual inputs, examples include Wikipedia, Amazon and Google and various types of grassroots classification.
Lastly, there is a piece of advice: let your mob develop your products and the swarm decide which to put into production (market research) and market it. Mobsource then swarmsource/crowdsource.
I talked to a friend of mine who wanted to outsource his start-up challenges. I advised him to do a pilot with his advisory board and am excited about the outcome. I came across a few examples of this beeing done, but is it being done successfully? It's a fine line between getting help for your problems and revealing proprietary information about your business.
Mind if i comment in Norwegian?
ReplyDeleteHvordan kan vi bruke denne teorien til å hjelpe ingeniørtp.no? :)